Published on New Politics Institute (http://www.newpolitics.net)

Time Magazine with a Millennial Phenomenon Cover Story [1]

Millennials [2] | Peter Leyden [3]

One thing about the mainstream media, when they finally detect a trend, they go nuts with it. And the trend of this political season is the political engagement of the young Millennial Generation.

time coverTime magazine coronates the trend with a cover piece that comes out this weekend on “Why Young Voters Care Again, and Why their Vote Matters [4].” The package pulls together all the pieces that have been emerging in primary contests of the last month and does a good job making the case about the power of the youth vote in this election. They also weave in the story of how the new tools are empowering this generation and increasing their clout. In doing so, they are a virtual infomercial for Obama, laying out how successfully his campaign has been in utilizing these tools and harnessing these voters.

For those who are familiar with our work at the New Politics Institute, we have long been championing both phenomena, and you can find more insights into both trends at our website [5]. It really is gratifying to see how powerfully these new elements of the new politics are playing out in actuality in this election cycle. Who would have thought?

The Big Picture: Technology Driving Change in Politics [6]
Laying out the analogy between broadcast television and the internet with respect to their impact on politics.

Obama’s Online Organizing Tools and Amazing Offline Results [7]

Blogs [8] | Internet [9] | Peter Leyden [10]

An interesting factoid was thrown into play today by Micah Sifry at TechPresident [11]. He did a comparison of how the supporters of the three major Democratic presidential candidates are using online tools at the campaign websites to organize offline activities like throwing house parties, fundraisers and phone banking.

The short answer is that Obama is overwhelming Clinton and Edwards. The numbers are really striking. Take the state of California where the statewide polls still have Hillary up by a surprisingly large margin. Yet you look at grassroots supporter-generated events in some of the key cities:

  • Los Angeles: Obama 170, to Clinton 8, and Edwards 0.
  • San Francisco: Obama 189, to Clinton 9, and Edwards 29.
  • San Diego: Obama 55, to Clinton 6, and Edwards 30.

Even if you go to Hillary’s home state of New York, Obama numbers tower over hers:

  • New York City: Obama 292, Clinton 13, Edwards 0.

Obama has clearly encouraged a bottom-up campaign that empowers his supporters to make things happen in his name. They clearly are responding in ways that have almost no parallel in campaigns on the other side – let alone on the Republican side, where there is almost nothing of this sort beyond the Ron Paul phenom.

We’ll see how this plays out by the primary day on Feb. 5th. My guess is that this is a ticking time bomb that is unnoticed now, but that will have large repercussions as the day to vote approaches. It’s not clear whether it will be enough to close the current gap, but I’d much rather have hundreds of hubs of campaign activity in a city than a handful, let alone none.

"It's no coincidence that you are watching higher turnout coincide with these new tools," said Peter Leyden, director the New Politics Institute, a liberal San Francisco-based think tank.

Voters are no longer "passive consumers" of political messages, Leyden said, and new technologies "are just drawing them into the fabric of politics, and are energizing the electorate."
"A wide-open race brings out the voters [12]," Baltimore Sun, January 10, 2008

The Millennial Youth Vote Takes Center Stage [13]

Blogs [14] | Millennials [15] | Peter Leyden [16]

Literally. In Clinton’s victory speech last night, young Millennials filled the stage behind her. This was in striking contrast to her Iowa speech, in which she shared the stage with a crowd of older people from the 1990s, including Madeleine Albright right next to her.

Both Clinton and Obama are aggressively courting Millennials, both for their votes, and for their energized involvement in their campaigns. Millennials are not just voters, but actors. And actors who deeply understand the powerful new tools of politics on the Internet.

The early numbers out of new Hampshire show how clearing the youth vote is trending towards Democrats and becoming crucial to the two campaigns of the leaders. Here are some numbers [17] from CIRCLE, the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement:

Initial New Hampshire Youth Vote Numbers:

* The youth turnout rate rose to 37% in 2008 compared to 18% in 2004 and 28% in 2000.

* 61% of young voters ages 18-29 in New Hampshire chose Democrats over Republicans (raw numbers are Democrats 43,753, Republicans 28,288).

* Young people choosing Democrats over Republicans continues the trend we saw in Iowa where 52,580 caucused with Democrats and only 12,650 turned out for Republicans.

Among Democrats, 18-29 year olds outperformed older voters (CNN exit polling):

* 18-29 year old voters made up 18% of the New Hampshire Democratic primary.
* 30-39 year olds made up 15%.
* 65 and older voters made up 13%.

Young people were split between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton (CNN exit polling):

* 18-24 year olds supported Barack Obama (61%) over Hillary Clinton (22%);
* 25-29 year olds supported Hillary Clinton (37%) over Barack Obama (34%);

This is all consistent with what we have been hammering at the New Politics Institute [18] over the last couple years. For more info about what we have been putting out and saying, see a previous blog post [19] explaining four of our key reports.

Techies and Geeks Tune into the Election [20]

Blogs [21] | Peter Leyden [22]

The giant Consumer Electronics Show [23] in Las Vegas next week will devote one of its super sessions to “The Changing Face of America’s Elections [24],” though it’s really about the impact of new tech and new media on politics.

I will be one of the panelists on Monday discussing this with Grover Norquist, President for Americans for Tax Reform, and Dan Glickman, CEO of the Motion Picture Association of America, among several others. It seems I will be holding up the more progressive end of how this technology is impacting the elections. Norquist and Charles Bass, CEO of Republican Main Street Partnership, will be holding up the other end.

The CES conference is a massive annual gatherings (among if not the biggest conference in the world.) It is where all the new tech products for the coming year are unveiled, and the tech tribe gathers to geek out on gadgets. However, it is a very important networking moment, and in the middle of it all this year, will be a discussion of politics.

If anyone in the NDN or NPI networks are in Las Vegas for this, come to the show on Monday morning, or ping me and we can connect.

"The larger context is that politics is going through an explosion of innovation," says Peter Leyden, director of the New Politics Institute, a liberal think tank focused on new technology. "It's a renovation of politics, like in the early '60s with broadcast television, which got figured out and became the norm. Who knows which tools will win out?"

"Clinton, McCain or Paul? New Website Tells You Who to Vote For [25]," Wired, January 2, 2008

Peter Leyden, director of the San Francisco-based Institute of New Politics, which recently issued a report on social networking as a campaign tool, said the sites are “a particularly effective way to reach young people,” La Politica says.

 

"Democratic candidates look for “amigos” online [26]," Statesmen.com, December 6, 2007
"It seemed more like CNN was picking and choosing the questions for their dramatic effect," said Peter Leyden, director of the New Politics Institute, which studies new media and politics and who was in St. Petersburg on Wednesday. "They wanted fireworks, and they got them."
"CAMPAIGN 2008 CNN-YOUTUBE GOP DEBATE: New-media debate sounds like the old Analysts say CNN picked questions to spark fireworks [27]," San Francisco Chronicle, November 29, 2007
Social Networking Tools in Politics - Full Event [28]
The full video for the Social Networking Tools in Politics event. You can watch specific parts by clicking the links below.
12 [29]3 [30]4 [31]5 [32]6 [33]7 [34]8 [35]9 [36]…next › [37]last » [38]
Syndicate content [39]
© 2008 New Politics Institute. All rights reserved. NPI is affiliated with NDN. Privacy Policy.

Source URL: http://www.newpolitics.net/node/

Links:
[1] http://www.newpolitics.net/node/502
[2] http://www.newpolitics.net/taxonomy/term/28
[3] http://www.newpolitics.net/taxonomy/term/2
[4] http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1708570,00.html
[5] http://www.newpolitics.net
[6] http://www.newpolitics.net/
[7] http://www.newpolitics.net/node/488
[8] http://www.newpolitics.net/taxonomy/term/21
[9] http://www.newpolitics.net/taxonomy/term/56
[10] http://www.newpolitics.net/taxonomy/term/2
[11] http://www.techpresident.com/blog/entry/19494/the_democratic_race_obama_dominating_online_organizing_of_offline_events
[12] http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nation/politics/bal-te.turnout10jan10,0,6321745.story?page=2&coll=bal_tab01_layout
[13] http://www.newpolitics.net/node/482
[14] http://www.newpolitics.net/taxonomy/term/21
[15] http://www.newpolitics.net/taxonomy/term/28
[16] http://www.newpolitics.net/taxonomy/term/2
[17] http://www.civicyouth.org/PopUps/PR_08_NH.pdf
[18] http://www.newpolitics.net/
[19] http://www.ndnblog.org/node/1675
[20] http://www.newpolitics.net/node/483
[21] http://www.newpolitics.net/taxonomy/term/21
[22] http://www.newpolitics.net/taxonomy/term/2
[23] http://www.cesweb.org/attendees/conferences/default.asp
[24] http://www.cesweb.org/attendees/conferences/search/session_detail.asp?ID_session=SS1&ID_track=SS_CES08
[25] http://www.wired.com/politics/onlinerights/news/2008/01/glassbooth
[26] http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/immigration/entries/2007/12/06/democratic_candidates_look_for.html
[27] http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/11/29/MN7KTKVIT.DTL
[28] http://www.newpolitics.net/
[29] http://www.newpolitics.net/taxonomy/term/2%3Fpage%3D1
[30] http://www.newpolitics.net/taxonomy/term/2%3Fpage%3D2
[31] http://www.newpolitics.net/taxonomy/term/2%3Fpage%3D3
[32] http://www.newpolitics.net/taxonomy/term/2%3Fpage%3D4
[33] http://www.newpolitics.net/taxonomy/term/2%3Fpage%3D5
[34] http://www.newpolitics.net/taxonomy/term/2%3Fpage%3D6
[35] http://www.newpolitics.net/taxonomy/term/2%3Fpage%3D7
[36] http://www.newpolitics.net/taxonomy/term/2%3Fpage%3D8
[37] http://www.newpolitics.net/taxonomy/term/2%3Fpage%3D1
[38] http://www.newpolitics.net/taxonomy/term/2%3Fpage%3D17
[39] http://www.newpolitics.net/taxonomy/term/2/0/feed